International Tax Planning for Multinational Corporations

Table of Contents

Summary

Tax Structuring for Multinational Companies In recent times, numerous transformations have occurred globally which was defined by a growing complexity and challenges when it comes to international tax planning for multinational corporations. By 2024, multinational enterprises (MNEs) are liable to an increasingly changing regime of regulation which includes the OECD's Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project as well as Pillar Two Global Minimum Tax. These changes have radically affected the management of cross-border taxation, forcing MNEs to evolve their tax strategies into more complex and compliant ones. In this environment, key considerations include optimal transfer pricing, efficient use of foreign tax credits and structuring decisions as well as the new digital economy challenges. In addition, changing attitudes towards transparency and responsible tax practices mean ESG considerations are beginning to influence corporate tax strategy. Multinational corporations that adjust to these challenges will be able to combine their tax efficient goals avoiding compliance and reputational risks, with enough flexibility due the uncertain world of global taxes.

Global Tax Landscape

ApproachedThe global tax environment has changed materially in recent years, which creates new opportunities and challenges for multinational corporations (MNCs) conducting cross-border activities. In 2024, the world has become a more complex and regulated place from a tax perspective as governments around the globe seek to address base erosion profit shifting(Tax Foundation n.d.) (BEPS) practices.

OECD Pillar Two Global Minimum Tax

OECD Pillar Two Global Minimum Tax: Among the most important features of international tax law is that, for Part I there are standards providing at least for a 15% global minimum income tax rate penalty which will be applicable to large MNE s. That agreement — announced in October 2021 and also involves more than 130 jurisdictions worldwide — is designed to ensure MNEs pay a minimum level of tax irrespective of where they have their head office. The Global Minimum Tax has implications for MNCs across the board:

  1. MNCs also must restructure their global tax strategies so they can both meet the new minimum rate of taxation and be as compliant with existing rules while still optimizing overall taxes.
  2. Tax Planning: Companies will need to manage their tax rates well across jurisdictions so that they are not caught by trigger for top up taxes in high-tax countries.
  3. Compliance Burden: The new rules impose more reporting and complexity that may lead to an increase in the compliance costs for MNEs.
  4. Investment decisions: Corporate operations and investment locations — potentially reshaping global flows of economic activity— could also shift in response to the global minimum tax.

Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Initiatives

Overall, the transition from BEPS 1.0 to BEPS 2.0 marks a significant departure from the existing framework of addressing tax avoidance by MNCs. BEPS 1.0, introduced in 2013, sought to address 15 specific action plans to combat tax bases erosion and profit shifting. On the other hand, BEPS 2.0, which encompasses the Pillar Two Global Minimum Tax, is a whole set of measures aimed at reforming international tax rules. BEPS 2.0 and its ramifications on international tax planning encompass the following:. First, BEPS 2.0 seeks to solve the issue of taxation in the digital economy. This implies that such giants as tech companies and other corporations with considerable digital presence across borders will be affected;. Second, economic substance is another issue that will gain significance. MNCs will have to demonstrate genuine economic activity in low-tax jurisdictions;. Transfer pricing, which will be updated along with new documentation requirements. The focus is to ensure arm’s length pricing in intercompany transactions(Hall, A 2024, August 17);. The modified MLI sets out new treaty benefits to avoid the issues of treaty abuse and double non-taxation; and. Transparency and reporting are other major aspects to be excited about. The country-by-country reporting will bolster tax transparency, which, in turn, allows tax authorities to provide information on the BEPS risks. These changes affect international tax planning significantly, which is a far-reaching consequence. MNCs now operate in a more complicated interconnected global tax system, while seeking to achieve both compliance and optimization. Being active participants in the new tax environment demands the following tactics: proactive tax management; enhanced data analysis; alignment of tax and businesses; and monitoring the global developments. Therefore, MNCs will have to grapple with changes to the U.S. Tax.C. laws and the ongoing enforcement of BEPS measures, ‎and the era of aggressive tax avoidance will no ‎longer be prevalent, as tax planning activity must be sustainable and ‎resilient over time, be compliant with the consensus of others. ‎across fair taxation globally.

Key Strategies for International Tax Planning

d

International tax planning for multinational corporations is a complex and dynamic field that requires careful consideration of various strategies to optimize global tax positions. As of 2024, several key approaches have emerged as particularly effective in navigating the intricate landscape of cross-border taxation(HCO n.d.).

Transfer Pricing Optimization

Transfer pricing is still integral to international tax planning(Thomson Reuters n.d.) for multinational enterprises. As the definitive arm's length pricing manual with application in all intercompany transactions(HCO n.d.), the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines have not changed significantly since most recent version of 2022. Some of the key aspects which may be associated with effective transfer pricing solutions include −

  1. Functional Analysis: Performing in-depth functional analyses to correctly demarcate transactions and distribute risks amongst members of the group.
  2. Benchmarking Studies – Carrying out extensive benchmarking studies to substantiate that the transactions are at arm's length.
  3. Advanced Pricing Agreements (APAs): APA negotiation with tax authorities, to provide transfer pricing methodology for future years.
  4. Documentation: Preserving detailed transfer pricing documentary backup to substantiate the company position in case of tax audits.
  5. Value Chain Analysis — Extracting arm's length profits where value is created in the group by aligning transfer pricing policies with the Group's Value chain.

Foreign Tax Credit Utilization

Utilizing foreign tax credits (FTCs) to the utmost extent is essential in minimising double taxation and thus, reducing overall effective global tax rate. Key strategies(Baker Tilly n.d.) include:

  1. Credit Planning – Efficiently recognizing income and tax payments to capitalize on the FTC usage within it´s limitations.
  2. Basket Management – Conducting a thoughtful analysis of the use and optimization for baskets: general, passive & GILTI in exception credit planning across business income types.
  3. Increase Available Credits: Using tax treaty clauses to minimize overall foreign withholding taxes.
  4. Expense Allocation: Improve methodology for the allocation / apportionment of expenses to foreign-source income in order to achieve maximum creditable foreign taxes
  5. Carryforward and Carryback: maximize credit utilization over time by using FTC carryforward and carryback provisions.

Entity Structuring

The way an entity is structured in various jurisdictions could have a very significant impact on the global tax position of any multinational corporation. Effective approaches(Tax Foundation n.d.) include:

  1. Holding Company Structures: Creation of holding companies in low-tax jurisdictions with extensive treaty network to manage global investments and remit profits back home better.
  2. IP Planning in Attractive Regulatory Jurisdictions: Placing IP ownership into tax-friendly jurisdictions by way of incentive support for innovation and R&D.
  3. Principal Company Structures: Placing principal company structures in tax advantaged locations to centralize business functions and risk.
  4. Hybrid entities (subject to anti-hybrid rules(Thomson Reuters n.d.)): Making use of hybrid entity structures based on differences in entity classification under the laws, and regulations of competent authorities.
  5. PE (Permanent Establishment) Management: Ensuring that the actions are managed in such a way it could not be inferred as an PE for higher taxing jurisdiction.
##Corporate structure diagram for multinational tax planning

Challenges in Adapting to New Tax Rules

d

In the rapidly evolving landscape of international taxation, multinational corporations face significant challenges in adapting to new global tax regulations. As of 2024, these challenges have become more pronounced, requiring companies to navigate complex compliance requirements, manage increased reporting obligations, and mitigate the risks of tax disputes.

Compliance and Reporting Obligations

d

One of the primary challenges for multinational corporations is the increased burden of compliance and reporting under new tax frameworks. The implementation of the OECD's Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) initiatives, particularly Pillar Two, has introduced a new layer of complexity to global tax compliance.

Pillar Two Implementation

However, the implementation of Pillar Two (intended to ensure that big corporate taxpayers pay a minimum standard amount of tax no matter where they are resident), is posing unique compliance challenges. It is 2024, and the rules were still too far ahead for companies to understand what they meant across many businesses from small- and medium-sized enterprises. Some of the deterrents in Pillar Two include:

  1. Just grasp the convoluted rules and how to apply them
  2. Modifying your internal systems to capture and use the data needed
  3. Complying with employment laws in multiple locations

Enhanced Transparency Requirements

The new tax laws are increasing the transparency around multinational corporations. The added transparency is not just something mandated by law, it's a cornerstone of good corporate tax strategy. Companies must now:

  1. Create durable data management systems
  2. Make sure your tax content is easy to find
  3. Report country by country The increased transparency requirements impose a huge burden of investment in tax technology and data management capabilities.

Tax Dispute Risks

d

The implementation of new global tax rules has also heightened the risk of tax controversies for multinational corporations. As tax authorities worldwide become more aggressive in their enforcement efforts, companies face an increased likelihood of disputes(Bloomberg Tax n.d.) and audits.

Factors Contributing to Tax Dispute Risks

  1. Patchy interpretation across jurisdictions of the new rules
  2. Tax regulations, in general (applied retroactively)
  3. Heightened focus on transfer pricing arrangements
  4. The difficulty in determining the rightly allocation of profits across borders Companies on the other hand, have turned to preventative measures such as: Strengthening interal tax governance structures Compliances such as :- Periodic risk assessments Participation in advance pricing agreements (APAs) with the authorities Investing in expert tax professionals and advisors

Communication with Executive Management

The key to addressing the challenges brought on by new tax rules relies in effective communication with executive management. By contrast, 73% of tax professionals had engaged with their executive management over the expected compliance and administrative burdens as part of Pillar Two during a KPMG survey — but only at a high level or not at all (the two groups accounted equal shares for almost half). This communications gap underscores the importance of tax departments to:

  1. Keep regulatory changes brief and clear
  2. Calculate the "true" dollar amount of future tax laws
  3. Document all the resources you need to adhere
  4. Prepare tactical strategies for more tax-efficient planning In summary, compliantly adjusting to the new tax regulations is definitely not a simple feat for multinational corporations. Due to the impact that tax has on a company's products and services, proper strategic planning is essential for companies aspiring to stay compliant as well be competitive in global markets. Without a doubt, in an industry moving faster than ever before while simultaneously subject to more oversight and scrutiny from regulators and other key stakeholders, diligence through the application of technology combined with greater efficiency will be required in ensuring that these problems are addressed.

Future Trends in International Tax Planning

d

As we look towards the future of international tax planning for multinational corporations, several key trends are emerging that will significantly shape strategies and practices in the coming years. These developments are driven by global economic shifts, technological advancements, and evolving societal expectations.

Digital Economy Taxation

A global economic structure which is undergoing a rapid digitization has posed unprecedented challenges to the traditional tax systems. With more and more business being done digitally, the challenge of tax authorities worldwide is how to find and effectively capture these transactions in order to assess taxes upon them. A key driver in this area is the OECD's Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) initiative, particularly Pillar Two for a global minimum tax rate. The BEPS plan will reshape the strategy of planning tax could carried out by multinationals in many countries. Main points covered in digital economy taxation that needs to be considered by the MNCs :-

  1. Digital Services Taxes (DSTs): Nearly 1 in every three countries has enacted or is considering a DST, targeting the revenue from digital services.
  2. This is the idea of a VPE — what it means to have "taxable presence" in today's world where that taxable presences can include digital footprints.
  3. Data Valuation: Tax authorities are looking to tax data collection and usage as the value of data is becoming exponentially higher. The changes will upend a key pillar of digital business models at multinational corporations, which may be forced to modify their operations or otherwise reorder activities in order to benefit from tax efficiency while adhering to new laws(HCO n.d.).

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Considerations

The influence of ESG factors in corporate strategy is increasing and now these same forces are starting to impact tax planning. Tax, and its related practices(Baker Tilly n.d.) are becoming a key focus both for corporate stakeholders (investors, clients etc), as well regulators who now specifically include tax management in broader ESG profile(Hall, A 2024, August 17) assessments. A Growing Taxing Landscape Corporations nowadays are faced with a myriad of various tax considerations, especially where it pertains to accessing global markets; some salient research on the subject:

  1. Transparency: Pressure is increasing on companies to reveal the tax measures they use and payments in each jurisdiction where their operations(Tax Foundation n.d.) exist.
  2. Carbon Taxes and Incentives – Pricewaterhousecoophas — Meanwhile, in part as a response to the increasing threat of climate change this decade will see almost every country with any significant carbon emissions taking serious steps toward mitigation.
  3. Impact on Society: Governments are starting to view tax planning strategies as detrimental to local communities and economies.
##ESG factors in corporate tax strategy infographic

References

[1] Tax Foundation. (n.d.). BEPS and International Corporate Taxation. Tax Foundation. Retrieved from https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/global/beps-international-corporate-taxation/

[2] Baker Tilly. (n.d.). Tax Strategy Playbook: Global Tax Outlook for 2024. Baker Tilly. Retrieved from https://www.bakertilly.com/insights/tax-strategy-playbook-global-tax-2024

[3] Tax Foundation. (n.d.). Details on the OECD Global Tax Agreement and EU Global Minimum Tax. Tax Foundation. Retrieved from https://taxfoundation.org/blog/global-tax-agreement/

[4] HCO. (n.d.). International Tax Optimization: Planning Before Migrating. HCO. Retrieved from https://www.hco.com/insights/international-tax-planning-strategies

[5] Hall, A. (2024, August 17). International Tax Strategies for Multinational Corporations. Aaron Hall. Retrieved from https://aaronhall.com/international-tax-strategies-for-multinational-corporations/

[6] Bloomberg Tax. (n.d.). US Multinationals Must Be Strategic on Pillar Two Compliance. Bloomberg Tax. Retrieved from https://news.bloombergtax.com/tax-insights-and-commentary/us-multinationals-must-be-strategic-on-pillar-two-compliance

[7] Deloitte. (n.d.). Pillar Two Tax Reform: Changes Coming in 2024. Deloitte. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/leadership/pillar-two-tax-reform-changes-coming-in-2024.html

[8] Thomson Reuters. (n.d.). International Tax Planning for Global Companies: Top 4 Strategies. Thomson Reuters. Retrieved from https://tax.thomsonreuters.com/blog/international-tax-planning-global-companies/

[9] Thomson Reuters. (n.d.). OECD's Pillar Two Tax Regime Effective 2024. Thomson Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.thomsonreuters.com/en-us/posts/tax-and-accounting/pillar-two-tax-regime/

‍